"Good Journalism Makes Democracy Works"

Unity Party Alliance Fires Back: Rallies Behind Boakai, Slams CDC Planned Protest and Supreme Court Ruling

222

By Desmond Gbeleh Wion

Monrovia – In a fiery display of political solidarity, the Unity Party Alliance (UPA) has declared unwavering support for President Joseph Nyuma Boakai and his administration, while launching a scathing condemnation of the opposition Coalition for Democratic Change (CDC) over its announced July protest. The UPA also openly questioned the neutrality of the Supreme Court following its April 23 ruling, which recognised CDC lawmaker J. Fonati Koffa as Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Addressing a packed press conference at the Unity Party headquarters in central Monrovia on Sunday, UPA leaders, flanked by thousands of energized supporters, accused the CDC of seeking to destabilise the country under the guise of democratic expression.

“The CDC has chosen the path of chaos over civility, destruction over development,” declared UPA National Chairman Melvin Togar. “Liberia has moved beyond the era when violence and confusion were tools for political gain. We will not allow regressive forces to hijack our peace.”

Echoing that message, the Unity Party Youth League reaffirmed its loyalty to President Boakai and underscored that any legislative bloc with a functioning quorum has the constitutional authority to carry out the people’s business alongside the Executive.

The Unity Party Alliance, a coalition of several former opposition groups now backing the Boakai government, emphasised that the administration remains focused on economic revival, infrastructure expansion, and job creation. It warned that attempts to incite unrest would be strongly resisted by the public in defense of Liberia’s democratic progress.

However, the UPA’s critique did not stop with the CDC. The alliance took pointed aim at the Supreme Court’s April 23 decision, branding it “disappointing, alarming, and suggestive of political compromise.” The ruling, which favored Koffa in the protracted House leadership crisis, drew a sharp rebuke from UPA leaders who accused the Court of undermining judicial independence and democratic norms.

“Our judiciary must be the final sanctuary of justice and neutrality—not a playground for political manipulation,” the UPA stated. “The April 23 ruling sends a dangerous signal to citizens who expect the courts to uphold the Constitution and maintain the separation of powers. The Supreme Court must rule without fear or favor and focus on restoring the civility of the state, not catering to politicians.”

The UPA argued that the Court’s decision failed to provide a sustainable resolution to the standoff at the Legislature. They questioned how the so-called “illegal” Speaker, Richard Koon, was permitted to perform critical functions—such as signing the 2025 national budget, approving salary increases for judges, and procuring additional vehicles for the judiciary—if his leadership was deemed unconstitutional.

“If Speaker Koon was illegal, why did the Supreme Court request salary increases through him? Why was he allowed to sign the very budget that now pays civil servants, including judicial officers?” the Alliance questioned. “This contradiction raises deep concerns not only within the UPA but also among Liberians at home and abroad.”

Despite the unfolding controversy, the Unity Party Alliance pledged to continue a series of nationwide engagements aimed at galvanizing support for President Boakai’s agenda. It urged citizens to resist what it described as “misinformation and fear-mongering” from the CDC and to remain vigilant in defending Liberia’s peace and forward momentum.

“This is no longer about political parties,” UPA youth leader Melvin Togar concluded. “This is about the soul of Liberia. We will stand resolutely to defend our democracy.”

Meanwhile, the CDC has doubled down on its protest plans, vowing a robust and combative demonstration in July aimed at sending a clear warning to the Boakai administration. With political tensions rising, it remains uncertain how state authorities will respond to the growing confrontation between the ruling establishment and its opposition.

Comments are closed.